We're often accused of being arbitrary, or (worse) "ironic" on The 'Cream, so to show that the site really is based on value judgements rather than mindless nostalgic regurgitation, we take time out here to celebrate one deserving aspect of past culture, while rightly blowing another, lesser, entity out of the stadium. And, if you disagree with any of the value judgements made here, send us your counterblast here.
The format is achingly simple - just write a paragraph or two of fulsome praise for one aspect of old pop culture (be it a celebrity, TV show, film, book, confectionery, playground custom, spate of industrial action etc) while simultaneously putting the boot into another one. But for the conceit to fully work, the two must be linked in some way. this can be an obvious link (eg Tiswas v Swap Shop), or a tenuous one, as with the first example (ie both involve the parents of female presenters of Live and Kicking).
![]() |
![]() |
|
...WELL, maybe not yet, but honours are long overdue for the never-bettered king of kids' science. And, in times when his daughter is a hundred times more famous for doing practically nothing than he is for doing practically everything, it's surely time to recall the great man's magic. Rarely are nominally "educational" kids' shows actually educational, but, some '70s schools' TV and the odd weird item like Professor Lobster and Ken Campbell's Erasmus Microman aside, TV has always found it a struggle to teach kids (or indeed anyone) something while keeping them entertained at the same time (you could mention James Burke at this point, but it's probably best you didn't). This came naturally to our Johnny, though - armed with a selection of props, a couple of costumes, a plastic mackerel and some terrible puns, he galvanised a kiddy audience (in as much as they can be galvanised) as the facts and gags flew fast and (often very) thick. His trick ("it's a trick!") was to impart knowledge in the character of a buffoonish uncle - misplacing things, forgetting his point, wandering off on nonsensical trains of thought - keeping the manner as far from that of the classroom as possible. He had the kids' TV equivalent of "star quality" in exactly the way Michaela Strachan doesn't. At his peak on his own Think Of A Number (and the many derivatives, from the slightly more staid, audienceless Think Again to the oft-ignored two-week condensed summer series Think Backwards), The Ball also had a hand in Play School, Jackanory, Cabbages and Kings, The Adventure Game and various more adult-oriented science affairs. The fact that he's never been equalled, either in the children's or adults' domains, says it all. He is a mystic, and there, in excelsis, was his stick. |
"LOVING", mused sink queen Nanette Newman in the 'foreword' to this 1974 75p Collins book, "is the first thing children learn - I wish life would teach them never to forget it." No. No, Nanette. The first thing children learn is the word "willy", followed almost immediately by other highly amusing rude words that are nowhere to be found in this pigdribble cash-in item, one of several sickly seventies compilations of children's drawings and enchantingly semi-literate sayings (see also the Christ-bothering God Bless Love) that clogged the bookshops in the same limp, sentimental way those little books of whatever do today. Think this is pure curmudgeonliness? Then read on: "You should never marry someone you don't like much." "Babys don't grow on trees." "Father Christmas and Jesus are best friends." "Old ladys arent reely old ladys. There just pepel waring old clothes." And so on. Any resemblance to your own single-figure childhood is entirely coincidental. Occasionally a hint of the real nature of the child shows through ("We went to Peter Pan and I hoped that Tinkerbell would die because she's like my sister") but this book and its companions were walking (out of the shops in great numbers, alas) embodiments of adult sentimentality foisted on children who neither want nor need it. At least today such whelpery carries big warning stickers saying "Disney" or "Spielberg on autopilot". The whole thing was a family affair through and through - the accursed tome was published by hubby's company Bryan Forbes Limited, and the cover was 'designed' by Nan's daughter, the infant Emma Forbes, no less. But the last word must go to 'Helen, aged 7', with the book's only remotely intriguing line: "My mummy sais I must love evreyboddy even the peple who killed my daddy but I dont." Er, quite. |
Miles Davis When I left school in '83 I became a Mechanic at a Austin Rover garage in Herne Bay, which must have had the highest concentration of Allegros and Princesses outside of Eastbourne, even Major Dunbar of Kirozokie (as it used to state on his job cards) had one. His was a 1750 Equipe, so that was the twin SU carb, OHC 5 speed Maxi lump, it really shifted... well sort of. Now the original Princesses were badged up as Morris, twin round headlamps and 1.8 B series engine a la MGB / Marina / 1800, then the Austin, rectangular headlamps same lump, but the real winner was the Wosley version with the 2.2 litre OHC lump, a Maxi engine with two extra cylinders nailed on the end !
David Mansfield The Grifter was so obviously more desirable for the kid of the time - only now has the Chopper attained some sort of nostalgic (70's style) bent. The Grifter was the ultimate 80's bike - chunky, funky with hand-twist gears...remember that, hand- twist gears. This was BMX before BMX. You even got blisters on the insides of your hands. (And that was just from doing wheelies) (Wheelies I said) Admitedly the Boxer kicked Budgies' ass in the playground, and don't forget the Tommahawk/Commando double header, but in the Big Boys league it was Grifter all the way And don't forget - with a deft fold of the rear mudflap you had a realistic motorcross noise. (even if it did leave a U shaped melted hole on your "flap") The Notting Hill boys might like choppers for the easy leg access, but us street-racers will always use Grifters.
Miles Davis About six months before the Grifter and Boxer came out Raleigh really broke the mould with the revolutionary "Striker", it came in commando green and featured a rear "Coaster" (back pedal) brake and motorcycle style front forks with dummy suspension gaiters, it was soooo trick at the time that people weren't sure about it, hence the delay in releasing the Grifter while it got "de sauced" and turned into what we know. I also remember the hideous "Grifter 2" with laser graphics and flippin square section Chopper tyres...
Miles Davis Wembley Footie, agreed top football, even better than the "Super Striker" found in huge nets outside Amoco stations. The one thing better than the strange "ring" it gave on punting was the way it could fly in bizarre directions as is being controlled by an external force. Because of this we all used to call them "Floaters", which incidentally was almost the name of the Ivory Coast's goalie in the African Nations Cup about seven years ago. Because of Falie Outa we all supported the Ivories and they were really shite, especially Mr. Outa... bastard.
|
For those that don't remember, Race and Chase was the Scalextrix equivalent of taking the mountain to Mohammed. At the height of the Dukes Of Hazzard's popularity (and my, what a dizzy (or should that be Daisy?) height that was), toy company Tyco realised that not every eight year old could afford the plane/train/automobile fare to Hazzard County (I was gutted, incidentally when I found out it didn't exist). Tyco, bless 'em, cleverly encapsulated all that back-axle car battering action in a box and sold it as Race and Chase. So rather than your conventional figure-of-eight circuit, you got a track with a section of the track that acted as a tilting ramp, sending either your Ferrari or police car soaring literally inches into the air. Sometimes, the car even landed in the groove on the other side as it was meant to. Of course, this meant the car bringing up the rear had nowhere to go but the backside of the ramp, I hear you say. But no, not content with this, Tyco also designed the cars to do U-turns! This was a tricky manoeuvre to say the least, but did result in you outrunning the cop/ catching the crook, as well as the glowing admiration of your friend as you sat cross-legged on his garage floor (as in my case). If you'd like to master the art of the U-turn, look no further than HERE where all is revealed. In short, this toy was far more fun than you had any right to expect. The whole idea brought an edge of excitement and danger to what essentially is the most overrated and expensive child's toy around, the electric racing set. Going round and round for an hour in a badly decaled Ford Escort Mk 1? No thanks, I've got my Race and Chase. Note RACE AND CHASE was not an official Dukes of Hazzard toy (as endorsed, presumably, by Piggy Productions), just a late 70s Cannonball Run/ Convoy/ Smokey and the Bandit type car chase cash-in. Good on 'em, I say. |
At the other end of the good toy/ crap toy spectrum, we find the Millennium Falcon. Now don't get me wrong, I'm a big a fan of Star Wars as the next mid-20's child, and there's no denying that the MF was the finest craft in the galaxy, kiddo. So where did Hasbro go wrong with what was sure to be a money magnet? I'll tell you- plastic. Now obviously the thing had to be made of the stuff, but did it need quite so much of it? When you watch the film, you see huge areas of the ship- cockpit, corridors, compartments and training rooms. You get the sense of a huge, lumbering yet nifty craft with hundreds of stowaway nooks and crannies soaring through asteroid fields. Then when you persuade the big people to shell out enough cash that they probably could have bought the actual ship and saved Han Solo from all that grief with Jabba, you were guaranteed certain disappointment. For a start, had no-one at Hasbro looked at the original plans of the ship? They'd obviously got the scale quite wrong. The cockpit could hold one figure, wedged in with his sticky-out legs and a couple more in the training room around the chess table. But where were the corridors, vents and service hatches? This may sound picky, but this sort of thing is not lost on an eight-year old. Whole sections of the ship were just hollow plastic, which granted was probably so it was light enough to carry the damn thing (When you've hands like little salad tongs, it seemed bloody huge). So it was big, but at the same time not big enough. Now, someone is bound to point out that it had all or some of these features and they thought the MF was the best thing since the little pop-up R2D2 at the back of the X-Wing. But this is how I remember it, and I have never forgiven Hasbro for as much. The whole thing was just a great big, plastic let-down when you imagined what it could have been, and knowing that your mum and dad had to let out the spare room to pay for the damn thing. Mike Cheshire |
Phil Hubbard I seem to remember 70s favourite Matchbox being the distributor of Race & Chase in this country. It was the top of the range "Powertrack" system The track was a small figure of eight affair with a tilting yellow jump ramp in the middle. the cars you got with it was a Blue & White rozzer with red lights on the top and a White vette with a wide yellow stripe down the middle of the boot roof & bonnet. Matchbox's "Powertrack" was not the only type of race track they dabbled in they had a go at emulating Ideal's TCR track too. This was imaginatively called Matchbox "Lanechanger" I don't think it sold too well as I or none of my mates ever had one of these. Race & Chase on the other hand was really cool and most of my mates had this. I ended up with a TCR set which was duff in comparison. I guess Tyco may have re released this type of racing in a similar guise but it was definately Matchbox who did this first circa 1980 methinks...